Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMPM/1608/2026 of JASWINDER SINGH @ SETHU Vs STATE OF HP on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Singh @ Sethu vs State of H.P Cr.M.P(M) No.1608 of 2026 24.08.2026 Present Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondent-State. Cr.M.P(M) No.1608 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Jaswinder Singh @ Sethu vs State of H.P

Cr.M.P(M) No.1608 of 2026

24.08.2026 Present Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondent-State.

Cr.M.P(M) No.1608 of 2026

By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/appellant for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal, which is barred by limitation.

Pursuant to notice issued in the instant proceedings, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General states that he does not intend to file any reply to the application, and as such this Court may pass appropriate order.

Having perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of lengthy administrative process and as such, delay in filing the appeal, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

Criminal Appeal No.______2026

Be registered.

Admit.

Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, waives service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent.

Record, if not received, be called for.

Cr.MP No.7543 of 2026

Reply, as prayed, be filed within a period of two weeks.

List on 07.09.2026.

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge August 24,2026 (meera)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead