Himachal Pradesh High Court
OMPM/399/2025 of NHAI Vs PARAS RAM AND ORS on 24 August 2026
its Project Director vs. Paras Ram OMP(M) No. 399 of 2025 24.08.2026 Present: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, vice counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.3. OMP(M) No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
NHAI through its Project Director vs. Paras Ram OMP(M) No. 399 of 2025 24.08.2026 Present: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, vice counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.3. OMP(M) No. 399 of 2025 The instant application has been filed for condonation of 250 days’ delay in filing the present appeal. It has been averred in the application that the impugned judgment was passed by the learned District Judge Mandi, on 02.12.2024. The certified copy of the same was applied on 11.03.2025 and the same was delivered on 07.05.2025. Thereafter, the office of the applicant/appellant took steps for engaging the counsel for filing the appeal before this Court, and in this process, delay has occurred in filing the instant appeal. The applicant/appellant has further submitted that the delay in filing the present application is neither intentional nor deliberate, but the same has occurred on account of bona fide reasons, as stated in the application. Learned counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents have no objection in case the application is allowed. In view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and keeping in view the fact that the learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents have no objection, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No.____/2026 (ARBAST No. 42910/2025) Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. List for hearing in due course. Record be requisitioned. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to supply entire paper book to learned counsel for the respondent during the course of day. OMP No. _____of 2026 (OMPST 45585/25) Application be registered. Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith up to date interest by the applicant/appellant, execution, implementation and operation of impugned award dated 18.04.2023, passed by Arbitrator and judgment dated 02.12.2024, passed by learned District Judge, Mandi, H.P. in CIS Registration No. 959 of 2024, shall remain stayed during the pendency of appeal. Needful be done within eight weeks from today. Application stands disposed off.
(Romesh Verma) Judge August 24, 2026 (Nisha)