Himachal Pradesh High Court
RSA/284/2025 of SANSAR CHAND AND OTHERS Vs PARSHOTAM AND ANOTHER on 21 August 2026
Chand vs. Parshottam RSA No. 284/2025 21.08.2026 Present: Mr. Abhilash Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Though, despite various opportunities, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has failed to file power of attorney, however
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Sansar Chand vs. Parshottam
RSA No. 284/2025
21.08.2026 Present: Mr. Abhilash Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice counsel
for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Though, despite various opportunities, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has failed to file power of attorney, however by way of last opportunity, as prayed for, ten days’ time is granted to do the needful.
In sequel to orders, dated 05.06.2026, 16.07.2026 and 12.08.2026, steps for the service of respondents No. 1, 3, 5 and 6 have not been taken till date. On the persuasive request of learned counsel for the appellant, 10 days’ further time, by way of last and final opportunity, is granted to do the needful, failing which the instant appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution without reference to the Court.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 21.08.2026 (pankaj)