Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/969/2026 of SUSHMA RANI Vs M. SUDHA DEVI AND ANOTHER on 20 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 969/2026 Decided on: 20.08.2026 Sushma Rani …..Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi & anr. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:35415 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 969/2026
Decided on: 20.08.2026
Sushma Rani
…..Petitioner
Versus
M. Sudha Devi & anr. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 08.01.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 695/2026.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office order dated 19.08.2026, whereby it has been stated that the State had preferred SLP(Civil) No. 24885/2026 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, wherein the State of Himachal Pradesh has been granted four months’ time to 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
comply with common judgment, dated 25.04.2026 as passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, in CWP No. 3361/2025 along with connected matters.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be closed at this stage, with liberty to file an appropriate application for revival of the instant petition in case grievance of the petitioner remains unaddressed.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notices are discharged.
(Romesh Verma) 20.08.2026
Judge (pankaj)