Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/868/2026 of SANJAY RIHAL Vs ANIL KUMAR SOOD on 19 August 2026
Anil Kumar Sood Cr.MP(M) No.868 of 2026 19.08.2026 Present Mr. R.S.Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant. Respondent present in person. Cr.MP (M) No.868 of 2026 By way of instant application, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Sanjay Rihal Vs. Anil Kumar Sood
Cr.MP(M) No.868 of 2026
19.08.2026 Present Mr. R.S.Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant.
Respondent present in person.
Cr.MP (M) No.868 of 2026
By way of instant application, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non- applicant/respondent.
Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on the account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay of 516 days in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The petition be registered. The application stands disposed of.
Cr. Revision No.____ of 2026.
Respondent, who is present in person, fairly admits factum of compromise arrived interse parties. He states that as per the compromise, petitioner-accused has agreed to pay the entire amount of compensation awarded by learned trial Court on or before the next date of hearing. He states that prayer for compounding the offence, if any, made by the petitioner may be considered after 20.09.2026.
In view of the above, list this matter on 23.09.2026, on which date, both the parties shall remain present in Court. However, it is made clear that in case the amount, as has been agreed to be made is not paid, this Court would be constrained to decide the petition at hand on the basis of the material already available on record on the next date of hearing.
CRMPST No.2969 of 2026
Since parties have resolved to settle their dispute amicably, as has been taken note hereinabove, it is ordered that till the next date of hearing, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in terms of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by learned Court below.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge August 19, 2026 (shankar)