Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/14089/2026 of HEM PRAKASH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 19 August 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14089 of 2026 Decided on: 1 9 .08 .2026 Hem Prakash and others …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.
14089
of 2026
Decided on: 1
9 .08
.2026
Hem Prakash and others
…….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others
… Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?2 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. This petition is disposed of with the direction that after the adjudication in Letters Patent Appeal by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, which has been preferred by the State against judgment dated 07.04.2025, passed by the Hon'ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in Inder Singh Thakur and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, the representation, which shall be filed by the petitioners, shall be decided by the Authority within 8 weeks as from the date of the adjudication of the Hon'ble Division Bench. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge August 1
9 , 2026
(narender) 2 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?