Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1140/2026 of ADARSH DEVI Vs GOPAL BARRY on 14 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1140 of 2026 Date of decision:14.08.2026 Adarsh Devi ...Petitioner Versus Gopal Barry ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1140 of 2026
Date of decision:14.08.2026
Adarsh Devi
...Petitioner
Versus Gopal Barry
...Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.,
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.4143 of 2026, dated 07.04.2026.
2. The learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 14.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that the judgment which was passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP(C) No.24885 of 2026 and before the Hon’ble Apex Court, four months' time has been granted to comply with the said orders. It has been stated in the order that since a conscious decision has to be taken by the authority in consonance with the judgment as passed by the Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
Hon’ble Apex Court, therefore, the matter may be kept in abeyance for about four months.
3. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition can be closed with liberty to file appropriate application in case the grievances of the petitioner still remain unredressed.
4. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed of, along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 14th August, 2026.
(vt)