Himachal Pradesh High Court

COPC/1115/2026 of VISHAL KUMAR Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1115 of 2026 Date of decision: 12.08.2026 Vishal Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Rakesh Kanwar & another ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1115 of 2026 Date of decision: 12.08.2026 Vishal Kumar

...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Rakesh Kanwar & another

...Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 3961 of 2026, titled Vishal Kumar vs. State of H.P. and another, decided on 02.04.2026.

2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the Office Order dated 29.07.2026, whereby after accepting the case of the present petitioner following order was passed:- “In view of the Hon'ble High Court orders and as per approval conveyed by the Govt. vide their letter dated 17.06.2025, 01.10.2025, & 14.11.2025, the petitioner is allowed the benefit of revised emoluments on contract basis as per Govt. notification dated 12.01.2022 subject to final outcome of LPA. The Principal of concerned school where the petitioner is presently working is hereby directed to fix the pay of the petitioner for the period they served on contract basis (TGTs) at the (60%) minimum of revised pay scale band + Grade pay (60%) alongwith such hike to which they are entitled to in terms of revised notification from 01.01.2016 to till their regularization subject to final outcome of LPA being filed by State and other legal remedies. However, an undertaking to this effect may be obtained from the petitioner that the overpayment if any, found, in later stage shall be recovered from them accordingly. The entry be also made in the service book of individual concerned. May inform the parties accordingly.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

3. This fact has been duly acknowledged by the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that in view of the compliance made by the respondents, the present petition may be closed.

4. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of, in the aforesaid terms. Notice is discharged. (Romesh Verma) Judge August 12 , 2026 (Nisha)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead