Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1084/2026 of SURINDER KUMAR Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 10 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1084 of 2026 Date of decision:10.08.2026 Surinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sourav Sharma,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1084 of 2026
Date of decision:10.08.2026
Surinder Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 3943 of 2026, dated 02.04.2026.
2. The learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 29.07.2026, whereby the case of the present petitioner has been considered and it has been ordered that the department is directed to fix the pay of the petitioner for the period he served on a contract basis as a TGT at the (60%) minimum of revised pay scale band plus grade pay (60%) along with such hike to which he is entitled to in terms of revised notification from 01.01.2016
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
till his regularisation, subject to the final outcome of the LPA as filed by the State.
3. Since, the judgment stands fully complied with by the State, therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition.
4. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 10th August, 2026.
(vt)