Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1023/2026 of DURGESH Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 6 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1023 of 2026 Date of decision:06.08.2026 Durgesh ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1023 of 2026
Date of decision:06.08.2026
Durgesh
...Petitioner
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 5066 of 2026, on 21.04.2026.
2. On 05.08.2026, the learned Additional Advocate General was directed to obtain current instructions in the matter. Today, he has placed on record a copy of the office order dated 05.08.2026, whereby the representation of the present petitioner has been decided and it has been ordered that the Principal of the concerned school is directed to fix the pay of the present petitioner for the period he served on a contract basis at the minimum of the revised pay band plus grade pay Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
along with such hike to which he is entitled in terms of the revised notification of 01.01.2016 till his regularisation as per the orders of this Court.
3. Since the judgment stands fully complied with, therefore, the instant petition does not require any further adjudication. Consequently, the petition is disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 6th August, 2026.
(vt)