Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/408/2025 of GIAN CHAND AND OTHERS Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS on 5 August 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 408/2025 Decided on: 05.08.2026 Gian Chand & ors. …..Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 408/2025
Decided on: 05.08.2026
Gian Chand & ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 25.04.2024, as passed by this Court in CWPOA No. 7218/2019 and judgement, dated 12.11.2024 in LPA No. 211/2024 .
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions, dated 04.08.2026 and copy of order, dated 29.07.2026, as passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, whereby the State of Himachal Pradesh has been granted four months’
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
time to comply with the judgment, as passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition can be closed at this stage, with liberty to file an appropriate application for revival of the instant petition in case grievance of the petitioners remains unaddressed.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notices are discharged.
(Romesh Verma) 05.08.2026
Judge (pankaj)