Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/235/2026 of DEV RAJ KAPTA Vs PRAVEEN AND OTHERS on 5 August 2026
Mahajan vs. Vijender Kumar Arvind Jain a /w connected matter CMPMO No. 315 & 326/2026 05.08.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both petitions. CMPMO No. 315/2026 Respondent No.2 stands duly served,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Sanjay Mahajan vs. Vijender Kumar Arvind Jain
a/w connected matter
CMPMO No. 315 & 326/2026
05.08.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both petitions.
CMPMO No. 315/2026
Respondent No.2 stands duly served, hence it is proceeded against ex parte. It is submitted by learned vice counsel for the petitioner(s) that the arguing counsel is unwell today. At his request, list on 10.08.2026.
CMPMO No. 326/2026
Though steps have been taken for service of respondent No.2, however records reveal that notices have not been issued to it. Registry is directed to issue notice for the service of respondent No.2 returnable within three weeks from today.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of entire paper book to the learned counsel for respondent No.1 during the course of the day.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 05.08.2026 (pankaj)