Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/981/2026 of CHINT RAM Vs ANJU SHARMA on 5 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 981 of 2026 Date of decision: 05.08.2026. Chint Ram ...Petitioner. Versus Er. Anju Sharma & another ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:32746
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 981 of 2026
Date of decision: 05.08.2026. Chint Ram
...Petitioner.
Versus
Er. Anju Sharma & another
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):
The present petition has been filed for non compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 1935 of 2026 dated 27.02.2026.
2. The matter was listed on 31.07.2026 and the learned Additional Advocate General was directed to obtain instructions. Today, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office order dated 15.05.2026, whereby the case of the petitioner has been considered and it has been held that the petitioner is entitled for grant of work charge status. Therefore, the present petitioner has been conferred the work charge status after completion of eight years daily wage service
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
we.f. 01.01.1998. However, the work charge status has been granted notionally without financial benefits.
3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition in case any of his grievance still remains unaddressed. Ordered accordingly.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid along with pending applications, if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 5th August, 2026. (kck)