Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1011/2026 of KISHORI LAL Vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER on 4 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1011 of 2026 Decided on : 04.08.2026 Kishori Lal ...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & another ...Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1011 of 2026
Decided on : 04.08.2026 Kishori Lal
...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & another ...Respondents.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) The present petition has been filed for non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 4100 of 2026, titled Kishori Lal vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another, decided on 07.04.2026.
2. During the pre-lunch session, learned counsel for the respondents sought time to obtain instructions in the matter. He has now placed on record a communication dated 04.08.2026 issued by the Divisional Manager, HRTC, Mandi Division, which reveals that DCRG amounting to Rs. 1616670/- and leave encashment amounting to Rs. 1175760/- has been paid today to the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the principal amount stands released to the petitioner, however, the amount of interest has not been paid.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
4. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the needful shall be done positively within a period of 12 weeks from today.
5. In view of the compliance as made by the respondents, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present case, save and except the direction that the respondents shall pay the interest amount to the petitioner within 12 weeks from today.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the present petition can be closed, however, liberty may be granted to him to revive the present petition, in case the grievance, as raised by the present petitioner, is not redressed. Liberty granted.
5. Consequently, the present petition is closed with liberty as prayed for. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma)
Judge August 4, 2026 (Nisha)