Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/986/2026 of DINESH KUMAR Vs ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS on 31 July 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 986 of 2026 Date of Decision: 31.07.2026. _____________________________________ Dinesh Kumar …….Petitioner. Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain and others ….… Respondents. _____________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 986 of 2026 Date of Decision: 31.07.2026. _____________________________________ Dinesh Kumar …….Petitioner. Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain and others ….… Respondents. _____________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bhupender Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. _____________________________________ Romesh Verma
, Judge
(oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the directions as passed by this Court in CWP No. 18684 of 2025, titled Kamlesh Kumari and others Vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on 1st December, 2025.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the office order dated 31st July, 2026, whereby the claim as set up by the
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
petitioner has been accepted, and relevant portion of the order reads as follows:- “xx xx xx In view of the Hon’ble High Court orders and as per approval conveyed by the Govt. vide their letter dated 17.06.2025, 01.01.2025, & 14.11.2025, the petitioner is allowed the benefit of revised emoluments on contract basis as per Govt. notification dated 12.01.2022 subject to final outcome of LPA.”
3. The said fact has been duly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, since the directions stand fully complied with, therefore, the present proceedings are closed. (Romesh Verma), Judge
31st July, 2026 (Guleria)