Himachal Pradesh High Court
OMPM/96/2026 of PROJECT DIRECTOR NHAI AND ANOTHER Vs SUBHASH CHAND AND ANOTHER on 30 July 2026
of NHAI & another vs. Subhash Chand & another OMP(M) No. 96 of 2026 30.07.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/ appellants. Mr. Hardik, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Project Director of NHAI & another vs. Subhash Chand & another OMP(M) No. 96 of 2026
30.07.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/ appellants.
Mr. Hardik, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2.
This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 of CPC for condonation of delay. It has been stated in the application that the impugned judgment dated 07.03.2025 was passed by the learned District Judge, Mandi, H.P. The certified copy of the impugned judgment was applied on 01.04.2025 and delivered on 24.04.2025. It has been further stated that after the passing of the judgment, the applicants contacted their counsel in order to procure the entire case file for the preparation of the present appeal, and after obtaining the legal opinion, the matter was reviewed by the regional office, and thereafter, immediately and promptly, the instant appeal was filed. The learned counsel for the applicants has shown sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal in the application for condonation of delay. The learned counsel for the non-applicants have no objection, in case the present application is allowed.
In view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and keeping in view the