Himachal Pradesh High Court

CMP.M/1097/2026 of ASHWANI KUMAR Vs ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS on 29 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Anil Kumar CMP (M) No. 1097/2026 29.7.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP (M) No. 1097/2026 The present application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the main appeal. It has been averred in the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Ashwani Kumar vs. Anil Kumar

CMP (M) No. 1097/2026

29.7.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate, for the

respondents.

CMP (M) No. 1097/2026

The present application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the main appeal. It has been averred in the application that even though certified copy of the impugned judgment and decree, dated 12.1.2026 was applied by the counsel on 15.1.2026 and delivered on 23.2.2026, however the counsel failed to inform the applicant about receipt of the certified copy of the impugned judgment and decree and the applicant was under impression that the aforesaid copy has not been received by the counsel. It has been averred that the applicant is a rustic villager and is not aware of intricacies of law. After receipt of copy of the impugned judgment and decree prompt action was taken for preparation of the appeal. Thus, the aforesaid delay is neither intentional nor deliberate, but has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances, which were beyond the control of the applicant.

The respondent has filed reply to the instant application.

In view of the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, paras 2 to 5 thereof, which is duly supported by an affidavit, coupled with submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, delay in filing the main appeal is condoned.

Appeal be registered. Application stands disposed of.

RSA No. /2026

Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to supply a copy of complete paper-book to the learned counsel for the respondents during the course of the day.

Send for the records. List for admission after two weeks.

CMPST No. 36183/2026

Be registered. Heard. The parties are directed to maintain status quo qua nature, possession and alienation of the suit property during the pendency of appeal. Alteration/modification/vacation on motion. Application stands disposed of.

(Romesh Verma)

Judge 29.7.2026

(pankaj)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead