Himachal Pradesh High Court

ARB.C/142/2026 of THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HPPWD KAZA DIVISION Vs NAWANG CHERRING on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arbitration Case No. 142 of 2026 Decided on : 27.07.2026 The Executive Engineer, Kaza Division ...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Nawang Cherring …..Respondent. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Arbitration Case No. 142 of 2026

Decided on : 27.07.2026

The Executive Engineer, Kaza Division ...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Nawang Cherring …..Respondent.

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) Notice.

2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. In view of nature of order being passed hereinafter no reply is required to be called from the respondent. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage.

4. Petitioner/State, which is the respondent before the learned Arbitrator, has moved the present petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking issuance of process to the witness details whereof have been given in para 3 of the petition, to attend the learned Arbitral Tribunal on 10.08.2026 in the office of Superintending Engineer (Arbitration), HPPWD, Solan,

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

H.P. for recording his statement in the arbitration proceedings pending before the learned Arbitrator.

5. The averments made in the petition, duly supported by an affidavit, read along with the order passed by the learned Arbitrator on 17.07.2026, suggest that the persons named in Para 3 of the petition, namely, Er. Dinesh Kumar Sen (Retd), S/O Sh. Bhim Sen, Village and Post Office Kotgarh, Tehsil Kumarsain, is required to give his evidence in the arbitration proceedings, and without issuance of the summons from this Court, the same would not be possible.

6. Consequently, in view of the above, the present petition is allowed. It is directed to issue process to the person named in Para 3 of the petition asking him to appear before the Learned Arbitrator on 10.08.2026 at 11:00 AM in the Office of Superintending Engineer(Arbitration) HPPWD, Solan to depose in the arbitration case. Dasti summons be also issued to the petitioner on steps being taken within two days.

7. The petition stands disposed of. In the aforesaid terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Romesh Verma)

Judge

July 27, 2026 (Nisha)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead