Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/898/2026 of RAJ KUMAR Vs ASHISH KUMAR KOHLI on 24 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 898/2026 Decided on: 24.07.2026 Raj Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:30639 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 898/2026
Decided on: 24.07.2026
Raj Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
Ashish Kumar Kohli ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
Notice. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 17.12.2025, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 19841/2025.
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
The matter was taken up in pre-lunch session and learned Deputy Advocate General sought time to have current instructions in the matter.
In post-lunch session, learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record, copy of office order, dated 23.7.2026, as passed by the Director, School Education, whereby representation of the petitioner has been allowed.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however, as prayed for, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court in accordance with law in case his grievance still remains to be unaddressed. Notice is discharged.
(Romesh Verma) 24.07.2026
Judge (pankaj)