Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/385/2026 of VIJAY KUMARI Vs SUDARSHANA AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 385 of 2026 Decided on : 23.07.2026 Vijay Kumari ...Petitioner. Versus Sudarshana & others ...Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 385 of 2026
Decided on : 23.07.2026 Vijay Kumari
...Petitioner. Versus Sudarshana & others ...Respondents.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Nemo. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy strictly in accordance with law as he is facing difficulty in the absence of the decree.
2. In case the petitioner approaches the learned trial Court for the relief, the learned trial Court is at liberty to act in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn, alongwith pending application, if any, with liberty as aforesaid. (Romesh Verma)
Judge
July 23, 2026 (Nisha)
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?