Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR/50/2026 of M/S DAIMLER FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs RASHID MOHAMAD AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CR No. 50 of 2026 Decided on: 23.07.2026 M/s Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Versus Rashid Mohamad & others ...Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CR No. 50 of 2026 Decided on: 23.07.2026
M/s Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Versus Rashid Mohamad & others ...Respondents.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Respondent No.3 proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 16.06.2026. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) It is heartening to note that during the pendency of the petition, the parties have entered into a compromise, whereby the petitioner has agreed to pay a total sum of Rs. 13,50,000/- to the respondent, Rashid Mohamad, within a period of three weeks from today.
2. It has further been agreed that the present petitioner shall close the loan account of the respondent and shall also issue the necessary NOC. The respondents undertake to withdraw all proceedings, complaints, and suits pending or filed against the
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
present petitioner before any competent Court of Law as and when the said cases will be listed before the competent Court/ authority.
3. With these observations, the present petition is closed and disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Romesh Verma)
Judge
July 23, 2026 (Nisha)