Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/268/2026 of RAJINDER SINGH VERMA Vs JOGINDER SINGH alias BITTU on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 268 of 2026 Decided on : 23.07.2026 Rajinder Singh Verma ...Petitioner. Versus Joginder Singh @ Bittoo ...Respondent. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. B.S.Chauhan, Senior
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 268 of 2026
Decided on : 23.07.2026 Rajinder Singh Verma
...Petitioner. Versus Joginder Singh @ Bittoo ...Respondent.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. B.S.Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yoginder Singh and Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. D.N.Sharma, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) In sequel to the order dated 22.07.2026, both the parties are present in the Court.
2. During the course of interaction with the parties, the respondent Sh. Joginder Singh @ Bittoo has agreed to pay the entire decretal amount to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum to the present petitioner on or before 30th September 2026. The said proposal of the respondent is not opposed by the present petitioner. The respondent has separately recorded his statement.
3. Consequently, in view of the statement as made by the respondent, the present petition is closed with the direction to the respondent to abide by his statement and to pay the decretal
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum to the petitioner on or before 30th September 2026, failing which, he shall be liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been compromised, alongwith pending application, if any. (Romesh Verma)
Judge
July 23, 2026 (Nisha)