Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/880/2026 of SONIKA DEVI Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 22 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 880/2026 Decided on: 22.07.2026 Sonika Devi …..Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & anr. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:30457 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 880/2026
Decided on: 22.07.2026
Sonika Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & anr. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, vice Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 16.3.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 3029/2026.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order, dated 30.6.2026, whereby the Director of School Education, Shimla, has directed the Principal of concerned school to fix pay of the petitioner for the period, 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
she served on contract basis (TGT) at the 60% minimum of revised pay scale alongwith such hike to which she is entitled to, in terms of revised notification from 1.1.2016, till her regularization subject to final outcome of LPA.
Faced with the situation, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be closed at this stage, with liberty to file an appropriate application for revival of the instant petition in case grievance of the petitioner still remains to be unaddressed.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notices are discharged.
(Romesh Verma) 22.07.2026
Judge (pankaj)