Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/831/2026 of POOJA SHARMA Vs RAKESH KANWAR and Ors. on 17 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 831 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.07.2026. Pooja Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:29382
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 831 of 2026
Date of decision: 17.07.2026. Pooja Sharma
...Petitioner.
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):
The present petition has been filed for non compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 16075 of 2024 dated 24.12. 2024.
2. The matter was listed on 16.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General had sought a day’s time to have instructions. Today, he has placed on record instructions dated 16.07.2026 along with other subsequent orders, whereby the Deputy Director, School (Elementary) Education, Bilaspur, H.P. has ordered for allowing of higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay structure to the petitioner after completion of two years regular service,
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s Case.
3. Though, the learned Additional Advocate General has fairly conceded that the arrears have been remained to be paid to the petitioner and needful shall be done positively within eight weeks from today.
4. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the present petition in case any of her grievance remains unaddressed. Ordered accordingly.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid along with pending applications, if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 17th July, 2026. (kck)