Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/829/2026 of YASH PAL AND OTHERS Vs RAKESH KANWAR on 17 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 829 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.07.2026. Yash Pal & others ...Petitioners. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:29381
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 829 of 2026
Date of decision: 17.07.2026. Yash Pal & others
...Petitioners.
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):
The present petition has been filed for non compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 15825 of 2025 dated 08.10.2025.
2. The matter was listed on 16.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General had sought a day’s time to have instructions. Today, he has placed on record instructions dated 16.07.2026 along with other subsequent orders, whereby the concerned Deputy Director, School Education (Elementary), Chamba, H.P. has ordered for allowing of higher pay scales in the concerned level of pay structure to the petitioners after completion of two years
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s Case.
3. Though, the learned Additional Advocate General has fairly conceded that the arrears have been remained to be paid to the petitioners and needful shall be done positively within eight weeks from today.
4. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition be closed with liberty to the petitioners to revive the present petition in case any of their grievance remains unaddressed. Ordered accordingly.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid along with pending applications, if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 17th July, 2026. (kck)