Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP.M/1764/2025 of STATE OF HP Vs Paramjit Singh AND ORS on 15 July 2026
H.P. vs. Paramjit Singh & others CMP(M) No. 1764 of 2025 15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants. Ms. Sonia Saini, Advocate, for respondents No.3 ( a ), 3(b), 3(d), 4, 5 ( a ) to 5(e), 6( a ) to 6(c). Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
State of H.P. vs. Paramjit Singh & others CMP(M) No. 1764 of 2025
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants.
Ms. Sonia Saini, Advocate, for respondents No.3
(a) , 3(b), 3(d), 4, 5 (a) to 5(e), 6(a) to 6(c).
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents Nos. 2(a), 7 (a) to 7(d).
Mr. Suresh Singh Saini, Advocate, for respondents No. 8, 10 to 13.
CMP(M) No. 1764 of 2025
The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. It has been averred in the application that copy of impugned judgment and decree dated 23.10.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Solan, HP was applied on 29.10.2024 and was supplied on 06.11.2024. Thereafter, District Attorney, Solan vide its letter dated 21.11.2024 forwarded the certified copy of the judgment alongwith his opinion to the office of the applicant/appellant. After receipt of the judgment and decree, from the office of District Attorney the matter was referred by the office of applicant vide letter dated 10.12.2024 to the Additional Chief Secretary (revenue) to the government of H.P. Thereafter, the file remained pending in different channels and in this process the delay has occurred. The applicant has further submitted that the delay in filing the present application is neither intentional nor deliberate, but has occurred on account of bona fide reasons, as stated in the application.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents have stated that they have no objection if the present application is allowed. In view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, and keeping in view the fact that the learned counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents have no objection to the condonation of delay, the present application is allowed, and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. ______2026
Appeal be registered.
Issue notice to the unrepresented respondents returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List thereafter.
Learned Additional Advocate General undertakes to supply copy of the entire paper book to learned counsel for the respondents during the course of the day.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge July 15, 2026 (Nisha)