Himachal Pradesh High Court
OMPM/249/2026 of NHAI Vs SHEELA DEVI AND OTHERS on 7 July 2026
Devi & another OMP(M) No. 249 of 2026 07.07.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel for the applicant. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 213 days in filing the present appeal. It has
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
NHAI vs. Sheela Devi & another
OMP(M) No. 249 of 2026
07.07.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel for the applicant.
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 213 days in filing the present appeal. It has been averred that the impugned judgment was passed by learned District Judge, Mandi on 29.03.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant had applied for certified copy of impugned judgment on 12.06.2025 and the same was delivered on 26.06.2025. However, the disposal of the case was not within the knowledge of the applicant as the same was never intimated to the applicant by its counsel.
As per the applicant, earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co, cases were withdrawn from it on 20.09.2023 and 26.03.2024. It is further submitted that the applicant was under bonafide belief that the instant case is pending before the learned District Judge, Mandi and on closing of the financial year, the applicant inquired from all the counsels/law firms about the pendency of all the cases pending in various forums throughout the State of H.P. and then it came to their knowledge that the objection petitions pertaining to Mohal Dehar have been disposed of. Thereafter, the applicant immediately contacted its counsel in order to procure the certified copy as well as record for preparation of the instant appeal. Therefore, it has been prayed that the delay in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicants has no objection in case the application is allowed.
Consequently, in view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
Arb. Appeal No._______/2026
Appeal be registered.
Heard.
Admit.
Send for records. List for hearing in due course.
OMPST No. of 2026
Be registered.
Heard.
Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount along with up-to-date interest by the appellant/applicant within a period of eight weeks from today, the operation, implementation and execution of impugned judgment dated 29.03.2025, as passed by learned District Judge, Mandi as well as arbitral award dated 15.02.2023, is ordered to be stayed during the pendency of appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 7th July, 2026
(kck)