Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/788/2025 of URMILA DEVI @ RUMLA DEVI Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 31 December 2025
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMPMO No. 788 of 2025 Decided on: 31.12.2025 ____________________________________________________ Urmila Devi ……….. petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ……….respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2025:HHC:46206 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CMPMO No. 788 of 2025 Decided on: 31.12.2025 ____________________________________________________ Urmila Devi ……….. petitioner Versus
State of H.P. and others
……….respondents ____________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Shashwat & Dixit Sahotra, Advocates.
For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
By way of the present petition, a time bound disposal in an effective manner in accordance with law is being sought qua an execution proceedings pending consideration before the Executing Court.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the execution petition in the case at hand is coming up before the Executing Court on 16th January, 2026.
3. Other than the aforesaid, in this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to the authoritative pronouncement of the Apex Court Judgment in 2024 2 SCR 946, titled as High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of U.P. and others, 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 Criminal Case No. 3589 of 2023. Relevant extract whereof reads as under:- “37. Subject to what we have held earlier, we summarise our main conclusions as follows:-
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx
c. Constitutional Courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other Courts. Constitutional Courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritizing the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending; and”
4. In view of the aforesaid, no interference from this Court is called for in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 31st December 2025 tarun