Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/20762/2025 of PRAKASH CHAND Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 31 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20762/2025 Decided on: 31.12.2025 Prakash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 20762/2025
Decided on: 31.12.2025 Prakash Chand
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………….
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner:
Mr. I.D. Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
J.D. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representations dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) and 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-8), seeking applicability of Sunder Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 Balo Devi & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3 and Roop Lal Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.4 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned Senior Counsel for the
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2Civil Appeal No. 6309 of 2017, decided on 08.03.2018 3 Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022 decided on 18.07.2022 4 LPA No. 196/2022 decided on 11.10.2023
petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 31st December, 2025(rohit)