Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/20796/2025 of SHAKUNTLA DEVI Vs HRTC AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20796 of 2025 Decided on: 31st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shakuntla Devi …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.20796 of 2025
Decided on: 31st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shakuntla Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate vice
Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation (Annexure P-2) seeking applicability of Jai Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 another2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Jai Chand2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 31, 2025
Judge Mukesh
2 CWP No.4593 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 25.08.2021