Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/923/2025 of SATYA DEVI Vs SHREE ANAND FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY PVT LTD on 31 December 2025
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.906 of 2025 a /w Cr.MMO Nos.914, 917 and 923 of 2025 Date of Decision: 31.12.2025 Cr.MMO No.906 of 2025 Harish Kumar …Petitioner Versus Shree Anand Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd. …..Respondent Cr.MMO No. 914
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2025:HHC:46188 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.906 of 2025 a/w Cr.MMO Nos.914, 917 and
Date of Decision: 31.12.2025 Cr.MMO No.906 of 2025 Harish Kumar …Petitioner Versus Shree Anand Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd.
…..Respondent Cr.MMO No. 914 of 2025 Yudh Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Shree Anand Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd.
…..Respondent Cr.MMO No.917 of 2025 Yudh Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Shree Anand Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd.
…..Respondent Cr.MMO No.923 of 2025 Satya Devi ……...Petitioner Versus Shree Anand Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd.
…..Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikrant Chandel,
Advocate, in all the petitions.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2025:HHC:46188 ) For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ganesh Barowalia and Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocates, in all the petitions. Virender Singh,
Judge
(Oral) Under instructions, it has been submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the matter has now been compromised between the parties. The photocopies of the compromise have been placed on record.
2. However, in view of submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, learned trial Court is requested to take into consideration the compromise, as entered, upon between the parties, as per law.
3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner has withdrawn all the petitions. The same are disposed of accordingly, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Virender Singh)
Judge December 31, 2025 (subhash)