Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/20812/2025 of KALPNA KUMARI AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2025
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20812 of 2025 Decided on: 31st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kalpna Kumari and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.20812 of 2025
Decided on: 31st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kalpna Kumari and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3. Petitioners seek applicability of Uttam Ram & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.5267 of 2023, decided on 22.09.2025
2
4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 31, 2025
Judge Mukesh