Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4084/2020 of RAMAN VERMA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 31 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4084 of 2020 Decided on: 31.12.2025 Raman Verma & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 4084 of 2020
Decided on: 31.12.2025 Raman Verma & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………….
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
CMP No. 31338/2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.
CWP No. 4084/2020
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: - “That the respondents corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners as has been done in the case of counterparts of the petitioners with all consequential benefits.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition, grievance of the petitioners and the reliefs prayed for by them have essentially been adjudicated upon in Manoj Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority are directed to examine the cases of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/competent authority to consider and decide the cases of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment by passing 2 CWPOA No.6612 of 2019, decided on 17.09.2025
appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 31st December, 2025(rohit)