Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./1688/2025 of RAJU RAM Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 31 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1688/2025 Decided on: 31.12.2025 Raju Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ......Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,

SHIMLA

Execution Petition No. 1688/2025

Decided on: 31.12.2025

Raju Ram

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors. ......Respondents …………………………………………………………………………………

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner:

Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional

Advocate General, for respondents

No.1 to 4.

Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate for

respondent No.5.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

Learned Additional Advocate General has handed over a cheque in the sum of Rs.5000/- drawn in the name of petitioner to his learned counsel in terms of previous order towards cost.

2. Pursuant to the detailed order passed in this execution petition on 12.12.2025, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record fresh consideration order dated 30.12.2025, in terms of which, the respondents have extended the benefits of the decision

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes rendered in Roop Lal Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 in favour of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of petitioner being 72 years of age, the respondents be directed to take further consequential action pursuant to the aforesaid office order by releasing the monetary benefits in his favour within a time-bound schedule.

4. In view of above, considering the age of the petitioner as also the office order now placed by the respondents, the petition to stand disposed of by directing the respondents to release the benefits flowing to the petitioner in terms of above office order within six weeks. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 31, 2025 (rohit)

2 LPA No. 196/2022 decided on 11.10.2023

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead