Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/252/2019 of JABINA AKHTER S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN Vs STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT. EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, on 7 October 2026
OF JAMMU, KASHMIR & LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 252/2019 Jabina Akhter and another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, GA Mr. Intikhab Hussian Shah, Adv. Coram: HON’BLE MR.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR & LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 252/2019
Jabina Akhter and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, GA
Mr. Intikhab Hussian Shah, Adv.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
07.10.2026
1. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners today. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have submitted that the relief sought in the present petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Union Territory of J&K and others v. Saba Wani, decided on 30.04.2026. It has been submitted that the rights of the petitioners are not protected, inasmuch as, before the closure of the Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme, no select panel was prepared pursuant to the advertisement notices, which are subject matter of the present petition. On this ground, it is being urged that the present petition cannot proceed further.
2. Be that as it may, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners today. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.10.2026 Rakesh PS 45 Rakesh Kumar 2026.10.09 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…