Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/3168/2026 of RAVISUN ELECTRICALS TH RAVINDER KUMAR REKHI Vs UT OF J AND K TH CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 3168/2026 Ravisun Electricals, 43 Sec 5 GF Trikuta Nagar Jammu J&K 180020 Through its Partner Ravinder Kumar Rekhi. Date of pronouncement: 05.10.2026 Date of uploading: 05.10.2026 …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra,

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP (C) No. 3168/2026

Ravisun Electricals, 43 Sec 5 GF

Trikuta Nagar Jammu J&K

180020 Through its Partner

Ravinder Kumar Rekhi.

Date of pronouncement: 05.10.2026

Date of uploading: 05.10.2026

…..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra, Advocate

Vs

1. UT of J&K through The Chief Secretary R.No. 2/7, 2nd Floor Main Building, Civil Secretariat, Jammu-180001

2. The Commissioner (Additional Chief Secretary) Power Development Department UT of Jammu and Kashmir

3. The Managing Director Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited BR Ambedkar Chowk, Jammu, J&K-180006.

4. The Chief Engineer, Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Canal Power House, Canal Road, Jammu J&K- 180002.

5. The Superintending Engineer, O&M Circle Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Panama Chowk, Jammu, J&K- 180006.

6. The Executive Engineer Sub Transmission Div-1, Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Behind Secretariat, Parade Jammu, J&K 180001.

Page 1 of 3

.…. Respondent(s)

Through:

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE

ORDER (ORAL) 05.10.2026

1. The short prayer made by the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having supplied the electric goods to the respondents (the functionaries of the Government) strictly in terms of the contract, they failed to honor the admitted dues/liability to the tune of Rs. 2,43,862/-. It is for this reason that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the Sr. No. 6

2 WP(C) No. 3168/2026

Page 2 of 3

respondents to release the due amount, which is admitted by the respondents. In order to substantiate its assertion, the petitioner has enclosed the reply to the RTI application dated 11.09.2025, furnished by the Superintending Engineer, O&M Circle, Jammu JPDCL. A perusal of the reply so furnished by the respondents/Superintending Engineer reveals that the respondents have already processed the claim of the petitioner for allotment of funds amounting to Rs. 2,43,862/-.

2. In view of the given facts and circumstances, once the respondents have admitted the liability that has arisen on account of performance of the contractual duty, it is the duty of the respondents to pay the outstanding admitted amount to the petitioner strictly in terms of its contractual obligation. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay the amount to the tune of Rs. 2,43,862/-, along with interest in terms of supply order and terms and conditions of such contract, as admissible under law after completion of codal formalities. Let this exercise be done within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is made available to the respondents.

3. Disposed of, accordingly.

(Shahzad Azeem) Judge Jammu 05.10.2026 Mihul

Whether the order is reportable?

Yes/No

Whether the order is speaking?

Yes/No Mihul Singh 2026.10.05 14:01

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead