Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2439/2022 of BASHIR AHMED Vs U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS on 30 September 2026

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 2439/2022 Bashir Ahmed, age 68 years S/o Sh. Ahmed Khan, R/o Village Ranjan (Loaki), Tehsil Bhalwal District Jammu. Date of pronouncement: 30.09.2026 Date of uploading: 30.09.2026 …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shayan Chauhan,

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP (C) No. 2439/2022

Bashir Ahmed, age 68 years

S/o Sh. Ahmed Khan,

R/o Village Ranjan (Loaki), Tehsil

Bhalwal District Jammu.

Date of pronouncement: 30.09.2026

Date of uploading: 30.09.2026

…..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Shayan Chauhan, Advocate

Vs

1. UT of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu.

2. Commissioner Secretary to Government, PWD (R&B) Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu.

3. Deputy Commissioner, Jammu.

4. Collector Land Acquisition, 220 KV, PDD, System and Operation Wing, Jammu.

5. Chief Engineer, O&M Cr-II, Jammu and Kashmir Power Transmission Corporation Limited (JKPTCL), Jammu.

6. Executive Engineer, Transmission Line, Maintenance Division (TLMD-VIII), Amhedkar Chowk, Railway Road, Jammu.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Malvika Gupta, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Meharban Singh, AAG

Page 1 of 3

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE

ORDER (ORAL) 30.09.2026

1. Despite the parties being not at variance insofar as taking over of the land of the petitioner by the respondents for installing the towers is concerned, but he is still made to run from pillar to post, clamouring for compensation under the relevant provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 [“the Act of 2013”]. Sr. No. 145

2 WP(C) No. 2439/2026

Page 2 of 3

2. On the other hand, Mr. Habib Choudhary, respondent No. 5, Chief Engineer, O&M Cr-II, Jammu and Kashmir Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (JKPTCL), Jammu, present through virtual mode, made a fair statement that in case the petitioner makes up the deficiency already indicated, the case of the petitioner will be considered and settled with due dispatch.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied in case respondents may process and settle the case for compensation within some time frame.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to the pray made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. With the consensus of the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to process and assess the compensation strictly in accordance with statute/law, and, pay the compensation within a period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is made available to the respondents.

6. Disposed of, accordingly.

(Shahzad Azeem) Judge Jammu 30.09.2026 Mihul

Whether the order is reportable?

Yes/No

Whether the order is speaking?

Yes/No

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead