Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2515/2022 of SHRI RAM Vs U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2515/2022 Shri Ram, Age 60 years, S/O Krishan Lal, R/O Ward No. 2, Mangnar, Tehsil Haveli, District Poonch. …..Petitioner Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate. Vs 1. UT of J&K through
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2515/2022
Shri Ram, Age 60 years,
S/O Krishan Lal,
R/O Ward No. 2, Mangnar,
Tehsil Haveli, District Poonch.
…..Petitioner
Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate.
Vs
1. UT of J&K through
Commissioner/Secretary to Govt.,
Industries & Commerce Department,
Jammu.
2. Deputy Commissioner, Poonch,
Near Airstrip, Poonch, Sheesh
Mohalla,
Poonch City, Poonch.
3. Director,
Geology & Mining Department,
Jammu.
4. Jammu & Kashmir Pollution Control
Board, through its secretary,
Parivesh Bhawan, Forest Complex,
Gladni, Narwal Jammu.
5. Director
Industries & Commerce, Jammu.
6. Block Medical Officer,
Poonch.
7. Executive Engineer,
PWD, (R&B) PHE. Poonch.
8. Executive Engineer,
Flood Control Division, Poonch.
9. Chief Education Officer, Poonch.
10. Ghulam Nabi Mir,
S/O Not Known,
R/O Mangnar Lower, Tehsil and
Serial No. 19
2 WP(C) No. 2515/2022
District Poonch.
.…. Respondents
Through: Mr. Deewakar Sharma, Dy. AG for R- 1, 3 & 5.
Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice
Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-2 & 8.
Ms. Meenakshi Salathia, Dy. AG for R-4
(Through Virtual Mode).
Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice
Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG for R-6.
Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice
Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-7.
Mr. Fahim Ahmed Dar, Adv for R-10.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(28.09.2026)
1. On perusal of the petition, it appears that the main grievance raised by the petitioner was with regard to the grant of consent/NOC in favour of respondent No. 10 for installation of a stone crusher.
2. In view of the withdrawal of the consent granted by the Pollution Control Committee vide Order No. 08-JKPCC/22 dated 28.11.2022, the grievance raised in the petition does not survive. The petition has, therefore, been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, along with connected application(s).
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
28.09.2026
Sneha
3 WP(C) No. 2515/2022