Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/3088/2026 of NASIM AKHTER Vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AN DOTHERS on 28 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 3088/2026 Nasim Akhter …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A.K Razdhan, Advocate vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE ORDER 28.09.2026 1. The
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3088/2026
Nasim Akhter
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. A.K Razdhan, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.09.2026
1. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondents to allow the Anganwari Centre Sagari to operate from the Village Sagari, the place for which the said Anganwari centre came to be sanctioned in the year, 2007. However, at the same time, the petitioner has specifically mentioned in the body of the petition that now that centre has been shifted from Centre Sagari to Village Chemi. Therefore, the relief prayed for cannot be considered in the given facts and circumstances of the case, particularly when the shifting of the centre already done in pursuance of a policy decision taken by the respondents.
2. At the same time, there is nothing on record to show that when this centre was sanctioned at village Sagari or as to how and under what circumstances, it came to be shifted therefrom. Serial No. 07
2 WP(C) No. 3088/2026
3. In view of the fact that this petition being deficient in material particulars, same cannot be considered so as to hoodwink the policy decision, if any, taken by the respondents.
4. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already approached the authorities by way of a representation which is stated to be still pending.
5. Keeping in view given facts, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and pass appropriate order, if not already passed, in pursuance whereof shifting of the aforesaid centre has taken place, within a period of four weeks from the date, a certified copy of this order is made available to the respondents.
6. Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(Shahzad Azeem)
Judge
Jammu 28.09.2026 Tarun /PS
Tarun Kumar Gupta 2026.09.29 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document