Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/3068/2026 of ADITYA SHARMA Vs ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECETARY POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 3068/2026 Aditya Sharma …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Anil Khajuria, Advocate vs Additional Chief Secretary Power Development Department and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP (C) No. 3068/2026

Aditya Sharma

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Anil Khajuria, Advocate

vs

Additional Chief Secretary Power

Development Department and

Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.09.2026

1. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondents for release of admitted liability to the tune of Rs.5,52,800/- and Rs.1,15,800/- respectively in respect of the work done pursuant to the contract allotted vide LOA No. ED/UDH/78899-7904 dated 07.02.2026 and LOA NO. ED/UDH/6419-24 dated 31.12.2025 along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. In order to substantiate his assertion the petitioner has placed on record the orders of allotment and bills raised on account of the completed works.

2. Since the petitioner appears to have executed the work in pursuant to the tenders floated by the official respondents and is stated to have completed the work. Therefore, the official respondents being the functionaries of the Sate are duty-bound to honour the contractual liability and clear all the bills for the work Serial No. 22

WP (C) No. 3068/2026

CM No. 6784/2026

duly executed pursuant to the allotments made in this respect.

3. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the grievance projected by the petitioner the matter is taken up on board.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. In the facts and circumstance of the case, this petition is, disposed of, at this stage with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and clear all the undisputed bills for the work duly done in pursuance of the contracts allotted vide LOA No. ED/UDH/78899-7904 dated 07.02.2026 and LOA NO. ED/UDH/6419-24 dated 31.12.2025, within a period of four weeks.

6. The instant writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above, along with the connected application(s).

(Shahzad Azeem)

Judge

Jammu 25.09.2026 Nikhil

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead