Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/123/2026 of MADAN LAL Vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 25 September 2026
123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026 Date of pronouncement: 25.09.2026 Date of uploading: 28.09.2026 Madan Lal .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate v/s UT of J&K & Ors.
WP(C) No. 123/2026
c/w
CCP(S) No. 68/2026
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 123/2026
c/w
CCP(S) No. 68/2026
Date of pronouncement: 25.09.2026
Date of uploading: 28.09.2026
Madan Lal
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate
v/s
UT of J&K & Ors.
.....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.09.2026
WP(C) No. 123/2026
1. The petitioner along with his co-sharers is recorded owner of land comprised in khasra Nos. 419 & 484 of village Kotla, tehsil Pouni, district Reasi.
2. The petitioner was led to approach this Court with present writ petition when the incumbent Executive Engineer PWD (R&B) Division, Reasi, emerged on the site for the purported purpose of road construction meant to be carried through the land of the petitioner comprised in aforesaid two khasra numbers without any acquisition process first being resorted to. Supplementary List I Serial No. 123
WP(C) No. 123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026
3. The petitioner has placed on record copy of nakal khasra girdawari of 2025 to confirm the fact that khasra No. 419 measuring 28 kanal 19 marlas and khasra No. 484 measuring 11 kanals are recorded in the private ownership of the petitioner and his co-sharers without any remote relation with PWD (R&B) Department.
4. This writ petition is disposed of at its very inception stage with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Deputy Commissioner (Collector), Reasi and also to the respondent No. 3- Executive Engineer PWD (R&B) Division, Reasi not to disturb the ownership and possession of the petitioner and his co-sharers with respect to the land qua khasra Nos. 419 and 484, without first adopting due course of law for whatever purpose and end the respondent No. 3 intends to deal with said estate of the petitioner and the co-sharers in the aforesaid two khasra numbers.
5. In view of the disposal of the above writ petition, nothing survives in the present contempt petition, which is accordingly closed. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU 25.09.2026 Sneha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No