Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/123/2026 of MADAN LAL Vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026 Date of pronouncement: 25.09.2026 Date of uploading: 28.09.2026 Madan Lal .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate v/s UT of J&K & Ors.

WP(C) No. 123/2026

c/w

CCP(S) No. 68/2026

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP(C) No. 123/2026

c/w

CCP(S) No. 68/2026

Date of pronouncement: 25.09.2026

Date of uploading: 28.09.2026

Madan Lal

.....Petitioner

Through :- Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate

v/s

UT of J&K & Ors.

.....Respondents

Through :- Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.09.2026

WP(C) No. 123/2026

1. The petitioner along with his co-sharers is recorded owner of land comprised in khasra Nos. 419 & 484 of village Kotla, tehsil Pouni, district Reasi.

2. The petitioner was led to approach this Court with present writ petition when the incumbent Executive Engineer PWD (R&B) Division, Reasi, emerged on the site for the purported purpose of road construction meant to be carried through the land of the petitioner comprised in aforesaid two khasra numbers without any acquisition process first being resorted to. Supplementary List I Serial No. 123

WP(C) No. 123/2026 c/w CCP(S) No. 68/2026

3. The petitioner has placed on record copy of nakal khasra girdawari of 2025 to confirm the fact that khasra No. 419 measuring 28 kanal 19 marlas and khasra No. 484 measuring 11 kanals are recorded in the private ownership of the petitioner and his co-sharers without any remote relation with PWD (R&B) Department.

4. This writ petition is disposed of at its very inception stage with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Deputy Commissioner (Collector), Reasi and also to the respondent No. 3- Executive Engineer PWD (R&B) Division, Reasi not to disturb the ownership and possession of the petitioner and his co-sharers with respect to the land qua khasra Nos. 419 and 484, without first adopting due course of law for whatever purpose and end the respondent No. 3 intends to deal with said estate of the petitioner and the co-sharers in the aforesaid two khasra numbers.

5. In view of the disposal of the above writ petition, nothing survives in the present contempt petition, which is accordingly closed. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE

JAMMU 25.09.2026 Sneha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead