Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Arb P/106/2026 of M/S LAKHANPAL FABRICATORS TH. RAGHUNATH LAKHANPAL Vs UNION OF INDIA , BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION TH. ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL,NEW DELHI AN DOTHERS on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

g e Serial No.01 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) Arb P 106/2026 M/S LAKHANPAL FABRICATORS TH. RAGHUNATH LAKHANPAL …Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Deepali Arora, Advocate. Vs. UNION OF INDIA, BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION TH. ITS

1 | P a g e

Serial No.01

REGULAR CAUSE LIST

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

(Through Virtual Mode)

Arb P 106/2026

M/S LAKHANPAL FABRICATORS

TH. RAGHUNATH LAKHANPAL

…Petitioner(s)

Through:

Ms. Deepali Arora, Advocate.

Vs.

UNION OF INDIA, BORDER ROADS

ORGANISATION TH. ITS DIRECTOR

GENERAL, NEW DELHI AN

DOTHERS

...Respondent(s)

Through:

Mr. Vishal Sharm, DSGI with

Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.09.2026

1. Ld. DSGI, Mr. Vishal Sharma, fairly submits that he has no objection to the application preferred by the petitioner seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the ld. DSGI, and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Accordingly, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal constituted in Arbitration Petition No. 58/2023, vide order dated 20th December, 2024, in relation to Work Order No. 800715/23/E8 for the design and construction of a 50-metre span steel superstructure, through-type major permanent bridge on open foundation over Poonch Nallah at Km 97.70 on the Srinagar–Baramulla–Uri road, under Project Beacon in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, pursuant to Contract

2 | P a g e

Agreement No. CA No. CE(P)BCN/08/2007/08, is hereby extended for a further period of three months from the date of expiry of the previous term.

3. The Arbitral Tribunal is expected to conclude the arbitral proceedings within the aforesaid extended period, in accordance with law.

4. A copy of this order shall be made available to the ld. Counsel for the parties under the name and signature of the Secretary.

5. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Parihar)

Judge

SRINAGAR: 25.09.2026 Shaista-PS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead