Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2989/2026 of MUKESH KUMAR Vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 21 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2989/2026 CM No. 6582/2026 Mukesh Kumar …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate. Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2989/2026
CM No. 6582/2026
Mukesh Kumar
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondent
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(21.09.2026)
01. Mr. Sumir Pandita, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that there is a formal defect in the writ petition on account of non-impleadment of Jal Shakti Department (PHE) and, therefore, he seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition with permission to file a fresh one. Prayer allowed.
02. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application with liberty as prayed for.
03. Fresh writ petition shall be filed by or before 12.10.2026.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
21.09.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 17 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.09.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document