Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/232/2024 of SUMIT MISHRA Vs LAKSHMI NARAYAN MISHRA AND ANOTHER on 18 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CM(M) No. 232/2014 Sumit Mishra .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Qayoom Choudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, Advocate v/s Lakshmi Narayan Mishra and another .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. R.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 232/2014
Sumit Mishra
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Qayoom Choudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, Advocate
v/s
Lakshmi Narayan Mishra and another
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. R.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Jain, Advocate for R-1
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, thereby challenging the order dated 27.06.2024 passed by the Court of Ld. Special Mobile Magistrate, 13th Finance Commission (Sub-Judge), Jammu in case titled “Sudarshan Kumar Mishra vs. Lakshmi Narayan Mishra”, as also the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Jammy in case titled “Sumit Mishra Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Misra and another”. The aforesaid orders have arisen out of the suit filed titled “Sumit Mishra Vs. Lakshmi Narayan Mishra” which has subsequently been dismissed for non-prosecution, as such, the instant petition has rendered infructuous..
2. Learned counsel representing respondent No. 1 has produced on record order dated 20.02.2026, which clearly reflects that the suit filed by respondent No. 2- Sudarshan Kumar Mishra, has been dismissed for want Sr. No. 52
2
CM(M) No. 232/2014
of prosecution, the interim direction has also been vacated. The documents are taken on record.
3. In view of the aforesaid position, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 18.09.2026 Rahul Sharma