Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/374/2025 of ABRAR AHMED Vs ATAL DULLOO AND OTHERS on 16 September 2026
19 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 374/2025 in [WP(C) No. 876/2025] Abrar Ahmed …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. C. M. Koul, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A . R. Bhat, Advocate V/s Atal Dulloo & Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Nisha Kangotra,
Sr. No. 19
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 374/2025 in
[WP(C) No. 876/2025]
Abrar Ahmed
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:-
Mr. C. M. Koul, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. A. R. Bhat, Advocate
V/s
Atal Dulloo & Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:-
Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice
Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM :
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.09.2026
1. In the present contempt petition, petitioner seeks implementation of the order dated 11.04.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 876/2025, by which the respondents were directed to take necessary steps for ensuring adequate drinking water facility to the petitioner.
2. Respondents have filed the statement of facts in which they have stated that Department had already issued water connection to the petitioner at village Dheda, from which he has been receiving water without any interruption despite the fact that he has failed to pay water charges.
3. It is further submitted that there is some civil dispute between the petitioner and some local people, who may have disrupted his
2
water supply but the petitioner did not approach the office concerned.
4. In view of the fact that the petitioner has received uninterrupted supply of the water, the order dated 11.04.2025 stands complied and nothing survives for further consideration.
5. Proceedings in the contempt petition are, accordingly, closed.
(SINDHU SHARMA)
Judge JAMMU Meenakshi 16.09.2026