Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2883/2026 of MEHNAZA BANOO AND ANOTHER Vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 15 September 2026
07 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2883/2026 Mehnaza Banoo and another …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Zulker Nain Sheikh, Advocate V/s UT of J&K and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Sr. No. 07
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2883/2026
Mehnaza Banoo and another
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:-
Mr. Zulker Nain Sheikh, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.09.2026
1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 4 to 7. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. Copies of Marriage Agreement dated 08.09.2026, Nikah Nama dated 07.09.2026, and proof of petitioners’ date of birth has been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 7, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr.; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.
WP(C) No. 2883/2026
3. Both the petitioners are present in Court and are identified by their counsel.
4. Perusal of the record annexed with the writ file reveals that petitioners are major and have contracted marriage on 08.09.2026 according to Muslim Personal Law, Rites and Customs.
5. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect their life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them.
6. Keeping in view the relief sought for, this petition is disposed of, at this stage itself, by providing that respondent Nos. 1 to 3 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a view on the basis of the available material and inquiry. If it is found that the parties are major and have married out of their own free will and consent, the necessary protection shall be extended to them.
7. The writ petition is disposed of along with connected CMs.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 15.09.2026 Shafqat