Jammu and Kashmir High Court

SWP/2244/2016 of MOHD.SAHYEED Vs UOI.TH.MINISTRY OF HOME AND ORS. on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 2244/2016 Mohd Sahyeed …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. V/s U.O.I & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rohan Nanda, CGSC. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER (15.09.2026) 01. There

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

SWP No. 2244/2016

Mohd Sahyeed

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: None.

V/s

U.O.I & Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Rohan Nanda, CGSC.

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(15.09.2026)

01. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the previous date of hearing. Same is the position today also, which suggests that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition.

02. Accordingly, the writ petition, is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).

03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.

(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE

Jammu 15.09.2026 Renu

S. No.29

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead