Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2006/2024 of UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY TO GOVT.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS Vs CHAIN SINGH on 14 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2006/2024 1. Union of India through its Secretary to Govt. of India, Minsitry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi- 110011. 2. Additional Director General Personnel Services, Adjutant General’s Branch, Integrated HQ of Ministry of

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP(C) No. 2006/2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Union of India through its Secretary to Govt. of India, Minsitry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi- 110011.

2. Additional Director General Personnel Services, Adjutant General’s Branch, Integrated HQ of Ministry of Defence (Army), DHQ PO, New Delhi-110001.

3. Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh-211014.

4. OIC Records, JAK Li Records, Pin – 911097, C/o 56 APO.

Date of pronouncement: 14.09.2026 Date of uploading: 14.09.2026

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC

vs

No. 9089778Y Ex Nk Chain Singh, S/o Shri Jankar Singh, R/o Village: Chandan Vihar (Lower Roopnagar), PO: Muthi, Tehsil: Jammu, District: Jammu.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate Mr. Chakshu Sharma, Advocate (th. VC)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE

ORDER (ORAL) 14.09.2026

Sanjeev Kumar-J

1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties very fairly conceded that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 27.11.2025 passed in WP(C) No. Serial No. 35

2 WP(C) No. 2006/2024

1294/2024 titled “Union of India and others vs. Balwant Singh” [2025:JKLHC-JMU:3933-DB], wherein this Court, having placed reliance upon regulation No. 95 of the Pension Regulations for the Army Part-I, 2008, has held that where an individual, while he was on extended period of service, is discharged in a lower medical category, permanently and that there is no alternative suitable employment in his grade or a category available to be offered to him, he shall be deemed to have been invalided from service. The law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Sukhvinder Singh vs Union of India & Ors.”, 2014(4) S.C.T. 163 would apply and the disability shall be deemed to be a minimum of 20%, entitling the individual to the disability element of the pension.

2. In view of the aforesaid, we find no merit in this petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.

3. Respondents to expedite the implementation of the judgment.

(Shahzad Azeem) (Sanjeev Kumar)

Judge Judge

Jammu 14.09.2026 Vishal Sharma

Whether the order is reportable?

Yes/No

Whether the order is speaking?

Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead