Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2742/2026 of MEHNAZ AKHTER Vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS on 14 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2742/2026 CM No. 6006/2026 Mehnaz Akhter …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. R. P. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2742/2026
CM No. 6006/2026
Mehnaz Akhter
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. P. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. The grievance projected by the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite she having been found most meritorious in the provisional merit list issued by the respondents in respect of Seasonal Education Volunteer pursuant to advertisement No. ZEOM/26/1282-84 dated 06.08.2026, the respondents are not issuing the engagement order in her favour.
2. It has been submitted that the engagement is seasonal in nature valid only for six months and the delay on the part of the respondents in issuing the engagement order in favour of the petitioner is causing great hardship to her.
3. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents was requested to get the feedback from the respondents about the status of the engagement order of the petitioner. Today, Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG, on instructions, has submitted that after the issuance of provisional merit list, some objections with regard Serial No. 15
2 WP(C) No. 2742/2026
to engagement of the petitioner were received from the local public and the said objections are being verified by the respondents, which has resulted in delay in issuance of engagement order in favour of the petitioner.
4. In view of the limited nature of controversy involved in the present petition, the same can be disposed of by extending appropriate directions to the respondents.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to deal with and dispose of the objections, if any, received against the proposed engagement of the petitioner, most expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date a copy of this order is made available with the respondents and in case there is no legal impediment in issuance of the engagement order in favour of the petitioner, the respondents shall proceed to issue engagement order in her favour in accordance with law within the aforesaid period.
6. Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 14.09.2026 Neha-II NEHA KUMARI 2026.09.14 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document