Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(Crl)/91/2026 of RAJESH KARLOPIA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB TH. INCHARGE S.H.O., POLICE STATION. AMRITAR AND OTHERS on 14 September 2026
20 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (Crl) No. 91/2026 Rajesh Karlopia …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Sumit Nayyar, Advocate V/s State of Punjab and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER
Sr. No. 20
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP (Crl) No. 91/2026
Rajesh Karlopia
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:-
Mr. Sumit Nayyar, Advocate
V/s
State of Punjab and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, some annexures have not been annexed with the petition, as such, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh. His statement is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 14.09.2026 Vishal Khajuria